What remedies are available in the first instance?

The Pyithu Hluttaw Election Law

Chapter XV

Decision on Objection of Election

71.          TheElection Tribunal may decide that the election of the Hluttaw representative isvoid, if it finds that an elected Hluttaw representative has been involved withany of the following:

(a)          thatit is apparent the elected Hluttaw representative obtained the majority votesby malpractices , or by inducement in the said manner, or the success orfailure of the election is due only to malpractices;

(b)          thatit is apparent malpractice has been committed in the interest of the electedHluttaw representative;

(c)        that it is apparent theelection is not free and fair;

(d)          thatit is apparent the election is not free and fair because of bribery andinterference in the exercise of electoral rights, or that the success in theelection is due to such acts;

(e)          thatit is apparent he is an individual or a member of any organisation contained inSub-sections (f), (g), (h) ,(i) or (l) of Section 10.

72.          (a)      The Election Tribunal shall, afterexamining the objections, submit to the Commission whether the elected personor the applicant who applied by submitting an electoral objection that he isentitled to be declared as the elected person is the elected person as Hluttawrepresentative.

(b)          Allthe members of the Election Tribunal shall sign the report in which theirdecision is included and submit to the Commission soonest.

73.          Onreporting by the Election Tribunal that the elected Hluttaw representative isguilty of malpractice due to the acts of a person other than the electionagent, the Election Commission may decide that the election of the said Hluttawrepresentative is not void if it is of opinion that it is due to any of thefollowing:

(a)          thatthe malpractice has been committed without the consent of the Hluttaw candidateand his election agent;

(b)          thatthe Hluttaw candidate and his election agent have prevented, to their utmost,malpractices in the election;

(c)        that the malpractices areof a trivial nature and have not affected the election;

(d)          thatthe election has been free from malpractice of the Hluttaw candidate and hiselection agent.

Source: http://www.networkmyanmar.org/images/stories/PDF3/l3b.pdf